FD NeuroTech/FD Rapid GolgiStain™ Kit (small)/1kit/PK401A

Golgi-Cox impregnation^{1, 2}has been one of the most effective techniques for studying both the normal and abnormal morphology of neurons as well as glia. Using the Golgi technique, subtle morphological alterations in neuronal dendrites and dendritic spines have been discovered in the brains of animals treated with drugs as well as in the postmortem brains of patients with neurological diseases^{3, 4}. However, the unreliability and the time-consuming process of Golgi staining have been major obstacles to the widespread application of this technique

FD Rapid GolgiStain™ Kit is designed based on the principle of the methods described by Ramón- Moliner², Glaser and Van der Loos⁵. This kit has not only dramatically improved and simplified the Golgi-Cox technique but has also proven to be extremely reliable and sensitive for demonstrating morphological details of neurons and glia, especially dendritic spines. The FD Rapid GolgiStain™ Kit has beentested extensively and widely usedon the brains from several species of animals as well as on the specimens of postmortem human brains.

Kit contents:

Store at room temperature

Solution A 125 mlSolution B 125 ml Solution C 125 ml x 2 Solution D 125 ml Solution E 125 ml Glass Specimen Retriever2Natural hair paintbrush2 Dropping bottle 1User Manual1

Materials required but not included:

• Double distilled or deionized water.
• Plastic or glass tubes or vials.
• Histological supplies and equipment, including gelatin-coated microscope slides, coverslips, staining jars, ethanol, xylene or xylene substitutes, resinous mounting medium (e.g. Permount®), and a light microscope.

References:

1. Corsi P. (1987) Camillo Golgi’s morphological approach to neuroanatomy. In Masland RL, Portera-Sanchez A and Toffano G (eds.), Neuroplasticity: a new therapeutic tool in the CNS pathology, pp 1-7. Berlin: Springer.
2. Ramón-Moliner E. (1970) The Golgi-Cox technique. In Nauta WJH and Ebbesson SOE (eds.), Contemporary Methods in Neuroanatomy. pp 32-55, New York: Springer.
3. Graveland GA, Williams RS, and DiFiglia M. (1985) Evidence for degenerative and regenerative changes in neostriatal spiny neurons in Huntington’s disease. Science. 227:770-3.
4. Robinson TE, and Kolb B. (1997) Persistent structural modification in nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex neurons produced by previous experience with amphetamine. J. Neurosci. 17:8491-7.
5. Glaser ME, and Van der Loos H. (1981) Analysis of thick brain sections by obverse-reverse computer microscopy: application of a new, high clarity Golgi-Nissl stain. J. Neurosci. Meth. 4:117-25.